Current:Home > reviewsTexas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban -Streamline Finance
Texas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban
View
Date:2025-04-13 17:22:21
Austin, Texas — A lawyer representing 20 women and two doctors argued before the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court on Tuesday that women have been denied lifesaving care under the state's strict abortion law as they seek to clarify what qualifies as a medical exception.
"We are just seeking clarification on what the law aims to do," said Molly Duane, a lawyer for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought the lawsuit.
Five women who were denied abortions under the state filed the lawsuit in March, and they were later joined by 17 other plaintiffs, including two doctors. The lawsuit, which was brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights, is believed to be the first to be brought by women who were denied abortions after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year.
Unlike other legal challenges to abortion laws, this case does not seek to overturn Texas' ban but rather to clarify what qualifies as a medical exemption. But Supreme Court Justice Brett Busby said the job of the court is to "decide cases," and not to "elaborate and expand laws in order to make them easier to understand or enforce."
Beth Klusmann, a lawyer for the state, argued Tuesday that the women did not have the standing to sue, suggesting that the women should have instead sued their doctors for medical malpractice.
Duane argued on Tuesday that because the law is unclear, the women were denied lifesaving care, and that the state's interpretation means that "women would need to have blood or amniotic fluid dripping down their leg before they can come to court."
Earlier this year, a judge in Austin ruled that women who experience pregnancy complications are exempt from the state's abortion ban. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed the ruling, bringing the legal challenge to the state Supreme Court.
In August, Travis County Judge Jessica Mangrum placed an injunction on the law, ruling that the plaintiffs faced "an imminent threat of irreparable harm under Texas's abortion bans. This injunction is necessary to preserve Plaintiffs' legal right to obtain or provide abortion care in Texas in connection with emergent medical conditions under the medical exception and the Texas Constitution."
The injunction was put on hold when Paxton appealed.
- In:
- Texas
- Abortion
veryGood! (7)
Related
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Funeral company owner allegedly shot, killed pallbearer during burial of 10-year-old murder victim
- In California, Climate Change Is an ‘Immediate and Escalating’ Threat
- El Niño is officially here and could lead to new records, NOAA says
- Charges: D'Vontaye Mitchell died after being held down for about 9 minutes
- Donate Your Body To Science?
- Visitors at Grand Teton National Park accused of harassing baby bison
- A kind word meant everything to Carolyn Hax as her mom battled ALS
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- EPA Again Postpones Enbridge Fine for 2010 Kalamazoo River Spill
Ranking
- Audit: California risked millions in homelessness funds due to poor anti-fraud protections
- It's getting easier to find baby formula. But you might still run into bare shelves
- Pat Robertson, broadcaster who helped make religion central to GOP politics, dies at age 93
- Jessica Simpson Shares Dad Joe’s Bone Cancer Diagnosis
- Police remove gator from pool in North Carolina town: Watch video of 'arrest'
- Offset and Princesses Kulture and Kalea Have Daddy-Daughter Date at The Little Mermaid Premiere
- Wildfire smoke-laden haze could hang around Northeast and beyond for days, experts warn
- How Big Oil Blocked the Nation’s Greenest Governor on Climate Change
Recommendation
Blake Lively’s Inner Circle Shares Rare Insight on Her Life as a Mom to 4 Kids
A doctor's Ebola memoir is all too timely with a new outbreak in Uganda
U.S. investing billions to expand high-speed internet access to rural areas: Broadband isn't a luxury anymore
It cost $38,398 for a single shot of a very old cancer drug
'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
What’s Eating Away at the Greenland Ice Sheet?
How some doctors discriminate against patients with disabilities
With Some Tar Sands Oil Selling at a Loss, Why Is Production Still Rising?