Current:Home > ContactAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Streamline Finance
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
TradeEdge View
Date:2025-04-11 01:00:48
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (15)
Related
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Halle Berry Praises James Bond Costar Pierce Brosnan For Restoring Her Faith in Men
- Los Angeles FC vs. Colorado Rapids Leagues Cup semifinal: How to watch Wednesday's game
- Fannie Lou Hamer rattled the Democratic convention with her ‘Is this America?’ speech 60 years ago
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Richard Simmons' family speaks out on fitness icon's cause of death
- Gigi Hadid Shares Rare Glimpse of Daughter Khai Malik in Summer Photo Diary
- Miles from her collapsed home, flood victim’s sonograms of son found on Connecticut beach
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- FAA sent 43 more cases of unruly airline passengers to the FBI for possible prosecution
Ranking
- British golfer Charley Hull blames injury, not lack of cigarettes, for poor Olympic start
- Small and affordable Jeep Cherokee and Renegade SUVs are returning
- 2-year-old killed by tram on Maryland boardwalk
- Voters in Arizona and Montana can decide on constitutional right to abortion
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Richard Simmons' family speaks out on fitness icon's cause of death
- Warner Bros. pledges massive Nevada expansion if lawmakers expand film tax credit
- 'Backyard Sports' returns: 5 sports video games we'd love to see return next
Recommendation
Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
Dance Moms’ Kelly Hyland Shares She Reached Milestone Amid Cancer Treatments
Vance and Walz are still relatively unknown, but the governor is better liked, an AP-NORC poll finds
Remains found on Michigan property confirmed to be from woman missing since 2021
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Former NL MVP and 6-time All-Star Joey Votto announces his retirement from baseball
Democrats turn their roll call into a dance party with celebrities, state-specific songs and Lil Jon
Nebraska lawmakers pass bills to slow the rise of property taxes. Some are pushing to try harder.